By Tim Castle
LONDON (Reuters) - A new pay contract for family doctors in England cost 1.76 billion pounds more than budgeted and has failed to deliver expected improvements in patient care, the government’s accounting watchdog said on Thursday.
The salaries of partners in GP surgeries have soared 58 percent since the contract was agreed but productivity has fallen 2.5 percent a year, the National Audit Office (NAO) said.
The largest part of the overspend — measured between 2003 and 2006 — was due to an underestimate of how much doctors would earn through the contract’s performance-related scheme, which pays practices more for meeting healthcare targets.
While there had been improvements in the care provided to sufferers of long-term conditions such as asthma and diabetes, the contract had failed to increase the low level of family doctors in some of the most deprived areas.
Karen Taylor, director of health audit at the NAO, said the contract, agreed in June 2003, had been poor for taxpayers.
“I think as far as the public and taxpayer is concerned, the benefits they should have been expecting to see have not materialised as yet to the extent they should have done.
“From their perspective, it’s not a good deal for them.”
The Conservatives said the government’s negotiation of the GP contract had been “incompetent and hopeless.” Continued…
Tags: accounting, extent, family, Family Doctor, family doctors, gp surgeries, perspective